Jamie R. Lynn

Partner

Jamie Lynn Photo

Washington, D.C.

P: +1.202.639.7786 F: +1.202.585.1026
  • LG Display v. Obayashi Seiko (D. D.C. & Fed. Cir.) – represented Defendant corporation in complex commercial dispute and obtained dismissal that was affirmed by the Federal Circuit
  • Custom Media Technology v. DISH Network (D. Del.) – represented Defendant in patent infringement litigation involving DVR technology; invalidated the patent at Markman
  • Dragon Intellectual Property v. DISH Network (D. Del.) – represented Defendant in patent infringement litigation involving DVR technology; succeeded on non-infringement theory as result of Markman
  • Realtime Data LLC v. Teradata Operations, Inc. (E.D. Tex. & C.D. Ca.) – represented Defendant against non-practicing entity on five patents directed to compression technology
  • Kappa Digital v. Hughes Network Systems LLC (E.D. Tex.) – represented Defendant against non-practicing entity on patent related to the transmission of digital messages
  • Elbit Systems Land and C4I Ltd. et al v. Hughes Network Systems LLC et al (E.D. Tex) – representing defendants in competitor suit involving satellite internet protocols
  • Elbit Systems Land and C4I Ltd. et al v. Hughes Network Systems LLC et al (E.D. Tex.) – representing Defendants in competitor suit involving satellite internet protocols
  • Phoenix Licensing, L.L.C. v. DISH Network et al (E.D. Tex.) – represented Defendant through Markman against non-practicing entity with respect to five patents directed to marketing technology
  • Qurio Holdings, Inc. v. DISH Network et al (E.D. Tex.) – represented Defendants in multi-patent suit against a non-practicing entity on set-top box and networking technology
  • Kappa Digital v. Iridium et al (E.D. Tex.) – represented Defendants and convinced non-practicing entity to dismiss suit in early stages of litigation
  • All-Tag v. Checkpoint (S.D. Fl.) – represented Defendant in competitor suit involving RF security labels used in the electronic article surveillance industry
  • CRFD v. DISH Network (D. Del.) – represented Defendant in patent infringement litigation involving whole-home DVR features
  • TQ Beta v. DISH Network et al (D. Del.) – represented Defendants in patent infringement litigation involving remote video display
  • Pantaurus LLC v. Sling Media (E.D. Tex) – represented Defendant in patent infringement litigation involving Hadoop
  • Pantaurus LLC v Samsung Electronics America (E.D. Tex.) – represented Defendant in patent infringement litigation involving FIPS 140-2 standard
  • Powertech Technology, Inc. v. Tessera (N.D. Cal.) – represented Plaintiff in complex licensing dispute
  • MOSAID v. Freescale et al. (E.D. Tex.) – represented Plaintiff in patent litigation involving semiconductor design, memory system, debugging hardware, and IC power management systems
  • Teleconference Systems, LLC v. AT&T Corp., et al. (N.D. Cal.) – represented Defendants in multi-party patent litigation involving videoconference technology
  • Whetstone v. Xerox et al. (E.D. Tex.) – represented Defendant in multi-party patent litigation involving printer-to-computer physical interfaces
  • Demeter v. Fujitsu et al. (E.D. Tex.) – represented Defendant in multi-party patent litigation involving printer-to-computer physical interfaces
  • WIAV Networks, LLC v. 3Com Corporation et al. (E.D. Tex) – represented Defendant in multi-party patent litigation involving 802.11 standard systems
  • Agere Sys., Inc. v. Sony Corp. (E.D. Tex.) – represented Plaintiff in patent litigation involving semiconductor manufacture, 802.11 standard, MP3 standards, and Blu-ray laser diodes
  • Keurig Inc. v. Kraft Foods Global Inc. et al. (D. Del.) – represented Defendant in patent litigation involving single-brew coffee machines
  • Adiscov v. Kroll Ontrack Inc. (E.D. Tex.) – represented Defendant in patent litigation involving neural networks