Select Options
Representative Litigation Cases
- Linquet v. Tile (Northern District of California; PTAB; Federal Circuit) – litigation and appellate counsel for Tile in patent litigation involving tracker technology.
- Fractus SA v. T-Mobile US, Inc. (Eastern District of Texas) – trial and litigation counsel for T-Mobile in a patent litigation related to base station antenna technology.
- Twilio Inc. v. TeleSign Corp. (Northern District of California; Central District of California; PTAB) – litigation counsel for Twilio in patent litigation related to telecommunications technology.
- Capella Photonics, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc. (Northern District of California; PTAB; Federal Circuit) – litigation and appellate counsel for Cisco in patent litigation related to MEMs technology.
- Patent Asset Licensing, LLC v. Bright House Networks, LLC (Middle District of Florida; PTAB) – litigation counsel for Bright House Networks in patent litigation related to telecommunications network technology.
- Bright House Networks, LLC v. Focal IP (PTAB) – PTAB litigation counsel for Bright House Networks in PTAB litigation related to telecommunications network technology.
- Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Focal IP (PTAB) – PTAB litigation counsel for Cisco in PTAB litigation related to telecommunications network technology.
- Iridescent Networks, Inc. v. AT&T Inc. (Eastern District of Texas) – litigation counsel for AT&T in patent litigation related to telecommunications network technology.
- Open Text S.A. v. Box, Inc. (Northern District of California) – litigation and trial counsel for Open Text in patent litigation related to document management and collaboration technology.
- ZeniMax Media Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (Northern District of Texas) – litigation counsel for Samsung in copyright infringement, trade secret, and unfair competition case involving VR technology.
- Labyrinth Optical Technologies LLC v. Oclaro, Inc. (Northern District of California) – litigation counsel for Oclaro in patent litigation related to optics technology.
- Finisar Corp. v. Oplink Communications Inc. (Northern District of California; Eastern District of Texas) – litigation counsel for Oplink in patent litigation related to optical transceiver technology.
- Mondis Technology Ltd. v. Innolux Corp. (Eastern District of Texas) – trial counsel for Innolux in patent litigation related to computer monitor technology.
- ACQIS LLC v. IBM Corp. (Eastern District of Texas) – trial counsel for ACQIS in patent litigation related to server technologies.
- Interactive Systems Worldwide, Inc. v. Mikohn Gaming Corp. et al. (District of Nevada) – litigation counsel for Mikohn Gaming Corp. and STB Holdings, Inc. in patent litigation related to real-time sports betting technologies.
- Zenith Electronics v. Thomson, Philips Electronics, TTE Technology, Pioneer Electronics (Eastern District of Texas) – litigation counsel for Zenith in patent litigation over patents essential for compliance with ATSC Digital Television Standard.
- Bookham, Inc. v. Unaxis Balzers AG et al. (Northern District of California) – litigation counsel for Bookham in patent litigation related to color wheel technology.
- HyperRoll Israel, Ltd. v. Hyperion Solutions (Eastern District of Texas) – litigation counsel for HyperRoll Israel, Ltd. in a patent litigation against Hyperion Solutions, The technology in this case involves database-management software.
- HyperRoll, Inc. v. Hyperion Solutions (Northern District of California) – litigation counsel for HyperRoll, Inc. in a declaratory judgment action brought by Hyperion Solutions. The technology in this case involves database-management software.
- Qualcomm Incorporated v. Nokia Corporation (Eastern District of Texas) – litigation counsel for Qualcomm in a patent infringement action involving cellular telephony systems and mobile TV applications.
- Widevine Technologies, Inc. v. Verimatrix, Inc. (Eastern District of Texas) – litigation counsel for Verimatrix in a patent infringement action involving encryption technology.
- Widevine Technologies, Inc. v. Verimatrix, Inc. (Western District of Washington) – litigation counsel for Verimatrix in a patent infringement action involving encryption and data stream flow control technology.
- OPTi Inc. v. nVidia Corp. (Eastern District of Texas) – litigation counsel for nVidia in a patent infringement action involving chipset design and operation.
- OMS Investments, Inc., et al. v. TerraCycle, Inc. (District of New Jersey) – litigation counsel for TerraCycle in trade dress infringement and unfair competition action.