Select Options
Patent Prosecution and Transactional
- Biotechnology company – development and management of a worldwide patent portfolio
- Autonomous vehicle company – development and management of a worldwide patent portfolio
- Medical device company – IP risk assessment in support of corporate mergers & acquisition; development and management of worldwide patent portfolio
- National banking institution – development and management of a worldwide patent portfolio
- Information standards organization – advice and counsel on licensing, patent litigation, and intellectual property risks associated with business transactions
- International provider of climate control products for the heating, ventilation, air conditioning and refrigeration markets – development and management of worldwide patent portfolio; advice and counsel regarding freedom-to-operate studies
- International convenience store chain – development and management of a worldwide patent portfolio; advice and counsel on licensing, freedom-to-operate studies, and intellectual property risks associated with business transactions
- International provider of milking systems and dairy farm equipment – development and management of a worldwide patent portfolio; advice and counsel regarding EU oppositions
- Start-up network security company – development and management of patent portfolio regarding cyber-security technologies
- International software company – advice on licensing, patent procurement, patent portfolio categorization, and IP support for corporate transactions
- International online retail company – patent procurement in the areas of cloud computing, electronic commerce, and robotic technologies
- International financial services company – development and management of a worldwide patent portfolio directed to financial services and electronic gaming applications; advice on licensing and litigation
- International networking company – advice on licensing, patent procurement, and patent portfolio categorization
- International semiconductor company – patent procurement and licensing in the areas of electronic and semiconductor products
- Start-up semiconductor company – patent procurement in the areas of semiconductor products and manufacturing
- Start-up wireless supply chain provider – development and management of a patent portfolio directed to wireless mobility and tracking using RFID technology; advice on licensing
- Optical networking company – development and management of a worldwide patent portfolio directed to all-optical processors and subsystems for high-capacity networks
Patent Litigation
- VOIP-PAL.com v. AT&T Corp., et al. (District of Nevada) – Defended AT&T against allegations of patent infringement involving Voice-over-IP technology in which case was dismissed following resolution of early motion practice and sustained on appeal to the Federal Circuit
- Intellectual Ventures II, LLC. v. AT&T Corp., et al. (Western District of Texas) – Defended AT&T against allegations of patent infringement involving DSL technologies in which case was dismissed based on pre-trial resolution
- Beco Dairy Automation, Inc. v. Global Tech. Systems, Inc. (Eastern District of California) – Represented GTS to assert patent and copyright infringement and trade secret misappropriation claims related to dairy equipment in which case settled
- Orlando Communications, LLC v. AT&T Mobility LLC, et al. (Middle District of Florida) – Handled patent litigation defense of AT&T regarding cellular technologies in which case was dismissed following resolution of early motion practice and filing of IPR petitions
- Digital CBT LLC v. AT&T, Inc. (Central District of California) – Handled patent litigation defense of AT&T regarding video processing technology in which client was awarded summary judgment of non-infringement
- SpeedGauge, Inc. v. Inthinc Technology Solutions, Inc. (Southern District of California) – Handled patent litigation defense and assertion regarding vehicle tracking technology in which client settled on favorable terms following claim construction order
- Agricultural Instruments Corp. v. BouMatic LLC (Western District of Wisconsin) – Handled patent litigation defense of BouMatic regarding dairy equipment in which client settled on favorable terms after initial discovery exchange
- Fractus, S.A. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd et al. (Eastern District of Texas) – Handled patent litigation defense of HTC America, Inc.
regarding antenna technology used in mobile devices in which client settled on favorable terms - TQP Development, LLC v. Merrill Lynch & Co., et al. (Eastern District of Texas) – Handled patent litigation defense of Merrill Lynch and Bank of America regarding data encryption in which client settled on favorable terms
- Restricted Spending Solutions, LLC v. Bank of America, et al. (Eastern District of Texas) – Handled patent litigation defense of Bank of America regarding e-commerce technologies in which client settled on favorable terms
- Actus LLC v. Bank of America, et al. (Eastern District of Texas) – Handled patent litigation defense of Bank of America regarding e-commerce in which client settled on favorable terms
- Network Signatures, Inc. v. Wal-Mart, Inc. (Central District of California) – Handled patent litigation defense of Wal-Mart regarding data encryption technologies in which client settled on favorable terms
- Arrival Star, S.A. and Melvino Technologies Ltd. v. Macy's, Inc. et al. (Southern District of Florida) – Handled patent litigation defense of Wal-Mart regarding supply chain technologies in which client settled on favorable terms
- RFID Tracker, Ltd. v. Wal-Mart Stores, et al. (Eastern District of Texas) – Handled patent litigation defense of Wal-Mart regarding RFID technology in which plaintiff stipulated to non-infringement following favorable claim construction order, which was sustained on appeal to the Federal Circuit
- Prism Technologies LLC v. Computer Associates International, Inc. (District of Delaware) – Handled patent litigation defense of Computer Associates regarding identity and access management technology in which plaintiff stipulated to non-infringement following favorable claim construction order, which was sustained on appeal to the Federal Circuit